(Click image for full resolution)



Download PNG


Download Photoshop File (ZIP)


Images depict copyrighted material and are
owned by the copyright holder, likely
Nintendo or its affiliates, unless otherwise
stated. It is believed that its use here falls under
fair use guidelines.

Confusion


| Mario | Zelda | Pokemon | Kirby | EarthBound |


| Blizzard | Confusion | Dig | Evade | Evolve | Fire Blast | Fire Spin | Fly | Freeze | Giga Drain | Gust | Hidden Power | Mega Drain | Poison Powder | Stun Spore | Swift | Thunder | ThunderShock |


Card Info


Title: Confusion
Cost:

2 coins

Quantity:

x1

Play:

Play when an opponent declares an invasion into a contested territory.

Description:

Destroy one fanboy or Hero in the invading territory for every 3 or lower that is rolled during the attack. The defending territory does not roll defense dice.

Notes

Hypno is a reclusive Pokemon that hypnotizes victims that wander into its territory. It can also use Confusion to disorient Pokemon. The afflicted Pokemon, like a dizzy kid, winds up tripping over itself and sustaining injury. This is a frustrating ailment, as the trainer is helpless but to watch the pocket monster flounder about. In War of the Fanboys, confused Fanboys and Hereos stand a chance of injuring themselves and friendly forces. And, as the saying goes that the larger they are, the harder they fall, so it is that the larger the invasion force when Confusion is used, the more likely the Fanboys are to destroy themselves.

The card art is Dark Hypno from Wizards of the Coasts Team Rocket set of Pokemon trading cards. This artwork was chosen because the pendulum is so prominent, which everyone knows is the key to proper hypnosis. The illustration is that of Kagemaru Himeno.

Clarifications



Can I play Confusion if an opponent invades a territory that I do not occupy?

Yes. As long as the defending territory is contested, Confusion can be used against the attacking force.

Discussion:

Name:
Comment:



Marylouise

says:
Posted: 2016-12-15 02:35:17
Dette ser bra ut, bortsett fra en ting. Hvis målet er åpenhet og trnsaparens, hvorfor da tillate anonyme ytringer på nett? En ting er å trolle på youtube o.l., men på norske nettforumer- og aviser blir det man sier tatt langt mer langt alvorlig. Jeg mener at ytringer på norske nettsider burde følge med fullt navn slik at man blir holdt ansvarlig for det man sier!